MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148557176 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2006.881185

A Split Vector-Radix Algorithm for the 3-D Discrete Hartley Transform

2006· article· en· W2148557176 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Fundamental Theory and Applications · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Filter Design and Implementation
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHartley transformRadix (gastropod)Twiddle factorAlgorithmDiscrete Hartley transformKronecker productMathematicsArithmeticDiscrete Fourier transform (general)Prime-factor FFT algorithmComputer scienceKronecker deltaFractional Fourier transformFourier transformFourier analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a three-dimensional (3-D) split vector-radix fast Hartley transform (FHT) algorithm. The main idea behind the proposed algorithm is that the radix-2/4 approach is introduced in the decomposition of the 3-D discrete Hartley transform by using an appropriate index mapping and the Kronecker product. This provides an algorithm based on a mixture of radix-(2times2times2) and radix-(4times4times4) index maps and has a butterfly that is characterized by simple closed-form expressions. This algorithm offers substantial reductions in the numbers of multiplications, additions, data transfers, and twiddle factor evaluations or accesses to the look-up table, without a significant increase in the structural complexity compared to that of the existing 3-D vector radix FHT algorithm

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score0.586

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it