Information borrowing methods for covariate‐adjusted ROC curve
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In medical diagnostic testing problems, the covariate adjusted receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves have been discussed recently for achieving the best separation between disease and control. Due to various restrictions such as cost, the availability of patients, and ethical issues quite frequently only limited information is available. As a result, we are unlikely to have a large enough overall sample size to support reliable direct estimations of ROCs for all the underlying covariates of interest. For example, some genetic factors are less commonly observable compared with others. To get an accurate covariate adjusted ROC estimation, novel statistical methods are needed to effectively utilize the limited information. Therefore, it is desirable to use indirect estimates that borrow strength by employing values of the variables of interest from neighbouring covariates. In this paper we discuss two semiparametric exponential tilting models, where the density functions from different covariate levels share a common baseline density, and the parameters in the exponential tilting component reflect the difference among the covariates. With the proposed models, the estimated covariate adjusted ROC is much smoother and more efficient than the nonparametric counterpart without borrowing information from neighbouring covariates. A simulation study and a real data application are reported.The Canadian Journal of Statistics40: 569–587; 2012 © 2012 Statistical Society of Canada
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.041 | 0.170 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".