MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148629971 · doi:10.1002/num.10048

Nonstandard discretizations of the generalized Nagumo reaction‐diffusion equation

2003· article· en· W2148629971 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNumerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsRunge–Kutta methodsApplied mathematicsEuler methodPartial differential equationStability (learning theory)Scheme (mathematics)Explicit and implicit methodsEuler's formulaBackward Euler methodDiffusionReaction–diffusion systemDifferential equationEuler equationsMathematical analysisFirst-order partial differential equationComputer scienceExact differential equation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A competitive nonstandard semi‐explicit finite‐difference method is constructed and used to obtain numerical solutions of the diffusion‐free generalized Nagumo equation. Qualitative stability analysis and numerical simulations show that this scheme is more robust in comparison to some standard explicit methods such as forward Euler and the fourth‐order Runge‐Kutta method (RK4). The nonstandard scheme is extended to construct a semi‐explicit and an implicit scheme to solve the full Nagumo reaction‐diffusion equation. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Numer Methods Partial Differential Eq 19: 363–379, 2003.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score0.452

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it