MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2148638686 · doi:10.1306/032101720602

Controls on the Geometry of Incised Valleys in the Basal Quartz Unit (Lower Cretaceous), Western Canada Sedimentary Basin

2002· article· en· W2148638686 on OpenAlexafffundabout
George W. Ardies, Robert W. Dalrymple, Brian A. Zaitlin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sedimentary Research · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityGeological Survey of CanadaEncana (Canada)
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeologyCretaceousStructural basinQuartzSedimentary rockPaleontologySedimentary basinGeomorphologyBasal (medicine)Geometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In southern Alberta, multiple episodes of fluvial erosion occurred during Lower Mannville, Basal Quartz time (Early Cretaceous), creating a series of incised-valley systems. This study examines two of these valley networks, in order to illustrate the geomorphic and genetic complexity of incised-valley systems. Both valley networks are filled by a transgressive succession of fluvial to estuarine deposits. Isopach mapping of these deposits over an area of approximately 10,000 km2 in southern Alberta shows that both systems are dendritic to rectilinear in character, with the trunk valley flowing from south to north along the length of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin. These systems were fed from the west, south, and east by a network of tributaries. Eustatic sea-level changes may have played a role in initiating river incision, but regional tectonic movements had an important influence on the history of accommodation change. The periods of erosion appear to have been relatively brief because the valleys are narrow, although confinement within cohesive, mudstone-rich paleosols of the underlying incised-valley deposits may have slowed valley widening. A relatively wet paleoclimate may also have contributed to the formation of narrow valleys by favoring the existence of single-channel rivers. The general morphology of the Alberta foreland basin, together with the distribution of unfilled relief associated with a preceding valley system and/or of less resistant, slightly older deposits, determined the location of the trunk valleys. Uplift of the Bow Island Arch (Sweetgrass Arch) to the east may have been responsible for a shift in the valley headwaters between the formation of the two valley systems. Synerosional block faulting in response to flexural loading had a significant influence on the geometry of the valley network through its control on the location and geometry of major tributary valleys. The trunk valley is also significantly narrower and more deeply incised where it crosses the most pronounced uplifted block. Enhanced erosion at tributary junctions and valley bends produced localized areas (ca. 2-3 km in diameter) where the valley fill is up to five times thicker and considerably coarser grained than the adjacent valley deposits. Such localized scour fills represent prime petroleum-exploration targets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.412
Threshold uncertainty score0.828

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations69
Published2002
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sedimentary ResearchSame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207