Economic Circumstances and the Stability of Nonmarital Cohabitation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using data from the first two waves of Survey of Labour and Income Dynamics (1993 to 1994), this article examines the role of economic circumstances in cohabitation dissolution through legal marriage or union separation. Data are analyzed using discrete-time event history methods separately for women and men and for each of the competing exits. The results show economic deprivation contributes to union instability; an overall deterioration in household economic circumstances increases the risk of union separation. Conversely, for both cohabiting women and men, an increase in personal earnings raises the likelihood of union separation, indicative of an independence effect. Whereas semiprofessional and skilled women are more likely to dissolve their unions through separation, professional and semi-professional men are more apt to marry their partners. Furthermore, women with incomes below the low-income cut-off point are more likely to separate than women with higher incomes. Implications of these results are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it