International Economic Sanctions, University Life, and Global Citizenship Education: The Case of Iran
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
U.S. economic sanctions against Iran have been the main feature of U.S. - Iran relations since Iran’s 1979 Islamic revolution (Katzman, 2013). From 2006, United Nations and European Union followed such policy against Iran, as a response to Iran’s progress in its nuclear program. While the purpose of these imposed sanctions is to stop the progress of the nuclear program, there is a concern regarding the destructive effects of the sanctions on Iranian citizens’ lives. The economy of a country is integral to citizens’ well-being and influences people’s lives in different ways. Higher education is one of the sectors that can be affected by the economic state of the country. Narrating the socio-historical background of the sanctions, this paper will argue about the role of the economic sanctions on Iranian citizens’ lives, focusing specifically on students. Since economic sanctions are arguably a means of violating basic human right, i.e., education, I will propose global citizenship education as a way to counter such a violation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it