The effect of meteorological parameters on diurnal patterns of airborne olive pollen concentration
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aerobiological studies carried out in the atmosphere of Granada using a Hirst-type volumetric spore trap during the period 1993-1996 show that there is not a single diurnal pattern for olive pollen (Olea europaea L.) over the course of the main pollen season. Examination of the behaviour of airborne olive pollen concentration allows the establishment of either regular (54.4% of the studied days) or irregular (45.6% of the time) patterns of diurnal variation. On a given day, the pattern found will depend on a combination of different factors: the origin of the captured pollen (either local or regional), source distribution in relation to the pollen sampler, topography, and different meteorological variables (mean air temperature, sunshine hours, total rainfall, relative humidity, wind speed and direction, and periods of calm). Regional sources were significant contributors to city centre pollen concentrations when moderate (< 10 km/h) winds from the 4th quadrant and warm temperatures (19-26 C) allow swift transport from the W-NW of the province.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it