MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149492071 · doi:10.7202/009173ar

Les détroits de Malacca et de Singapour

2004· article· fr· W2149492071 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes internationales · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMaritime Security and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceGeographyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les détroits de Malacca et de Singapour font partie de la route la plus courte entre l’Europe et l’Asie. Toute perturbation de la navigation a de graves conséquences sur le plan militaire et commercial. Une série d’enjeux est soulevée ici : quelles sont les menaces les plus importantes à la sécurité maritime et aux lignes de communication maritime ; quelles mesures ont été mises en oeuvre afin de protéger la sécurité maritime ; et quelles seraient les conséquences sur la navigation des pétroliers et le transport des conteneurs si l’accès aux détroits était restreint ou interdit ? Nous aborderons ces questions en analysant la sécurité maritime et la pollution par le pétrole, la piraterie et les vols à main armée, ainsi que les mesures adoptées par les États côtiers et utilisateurs à cet égard. Une évaluation du coût du recours à d’autres routes est aussi effectuée. Nous explorerons les différences entre la navigation des pétroliers et le transport des conteneurs afin de remettre en question la croyance populaire concernant les passages obligés.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it