MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149492071 · doi:10.7202/009173ar

Les détroits de Malacca et de Singapour

2004· article· fr· W2149492071 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Peter J. Rimmer

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes internationales · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMaritime Security and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceGeographyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les détroits de Malacca et de Singapour font partie de la route la plus courte entre l’Europe et l’Asie. Toute perturbation de la navigation a de graves conséquences sur le plan militaire et commercial. Une série d’enjeux est soulevée ici : quelles sont les menaces les plus importantes à la sécurité maritime et aux lignes de communication maritime ; quelles mesures ont été mises en oeuvre afin de protéger la sécurité maritime ; et quelles seraient les conséquences sur la navigation des pétroliers et le transport des conteneurs si l’accès aux détroits était restreint ou interdit ? Nous aborderons ces questions en analysant la sécurité maritime et la pollution par le pétrole, la piraterie et les vols à main armée, ainsi que les mesures adoptées par les États côtiers et utilisateurs à cet égard. Une évaluation du coût du recours à d’autres routes est aussi effectuée. Nous explorerons les différences entre la navigation des pétroliers et le transport des conteneurs afin de remettre en question la croyance populaire concernant les passages obligés.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.232
Threshold uncertainty score0.461

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes internationalesSame topicMaritime Security and HistoryFrench-language works237,207