MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149547948 · doi:10.1109/icnn.1993.298516

A distributed adaptive control system for a quadruped mobile robot

2002· article· en· W2149547948 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE International Conference on Neural Networks · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Locomotion and Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinforcement learningRobotComputer scienceActuatorMobile robotGaitArtificial intelligenceControl (management)Controller (irrigation)Adaptive behaviorControl engineeringControl theory (sociology)EngineeringPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A method by which reinforcement learning can be combined into a behavior based control system is presented. Behaviors which are impossible or impractical to embed as predetermined responses are learned through self-exploration and self-organization using a temporal difference reinforcement learning technique. This results in what is referred to as a distributed adaptive control system (DACS), which is, in effect, the robot's artificial nervous system. A DACS is developed for a simulated quadruped mobile robot and the locomotion behavior level is isolated and evaluated. At the locomotion level the proper actuator sequences are learned for all possible gaits and eventually graceful gait transitions are also learned. When confronted with an actuator malfunction, all gaits and transitions are adapted resulting in new limping gaits for the quadruped.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score0.851

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it