MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149567218 · doi:10.1109/tit.2009.2032831

On Properties of Locally Optimal Multiple Description Scalar Quantizers With Convex Cells

2009· article· en· W2149567218 on OpenAlexaff
Sorina Dumitrescu, Xiaolin Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Information Theory · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Compression Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsScalar (mathematics)Regular polygonUniquenessProbability density functionApplied mathematicsConvex functionConvex optimizationMathematical optimizationDiscrete mathematicsMathematical analysisStatisticsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is known that the generalized Lloyd method is applicable to locally optimal multiple description scalar quantizer (MDSQ) design. However, it remains unsettled when the resulting MDSQ is also globally optimal. We partially answer the above question by proving that for a fixed index assignment there is a unique locally optimal fixed-rate MDSQ of convex cells under Trushkin's sufficient conditions for the uniqueness of locally optimal fixed-rate single description scalar quantizer. This result holds for fixed-rate multiresolution scalar quantizer (MRSQ) of convex cells as well. Thus, the well-known log-concave probability density function (pdf) condition can be extended to the multiple description and multiresolution cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Information TheorySame topicAdvanced Data Compression TechniquesFrench-language works237,207