MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149673871 · doi:10.1109/61.852981

A computer-aided technique for generating substation interlocking schemes

2000· article· en· W2149673871 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems and Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterlockingCircuit breakerSoftwareEngineeringComputer scienceState (computer science)Control reconfigurationPower (physics)Reliability engineeringElectrical engineeringEmbedded systemOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The continuity of power supply is maintained by reconfiguring a power system as its operating state changes. The reconfiguration is done by opening and closing circuit breakers and isolators. An improper operation of a switch can damage equipment and/or adversely affect the quality of the supply to the customers. Switching operations are performed by operators (as well as by substation controllers) using pre-defined guidelines including interlocking of switches. A major obstacle in using computerized switching schemes is that interlocking logic has to be designed specifically for each substation. This paper describes the design of a software application that can be used to automatically generate interlocking schemes for substations. The software has two components, one to generate the interlocking scheme from the substation data and the other to generate switching instructions and implement them. Three examples of interlocking schemes are included in the paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.767
Threshold uncertainty score0.748

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it