Digital ink compression via functional approximation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Representing digital ink traces as points in a function space has proven useful for online recognition. Ink trace coordinates or their integral invariants are written as parametric functions and approximated by truncated orthogonal series. This representation captures the shape of the ink traces with a small number of coefficients in a form quite compact and independent of device resolution, and various geometric techniques may be employed for recognition. The simplicity and high performance of this method lead us to ask whether the same idea can be applied to another important aspect in online handwriting the compression of digital ink strokes. We have investigated Chebyshev, Legendre and Legendre-Sobolev orthogonal polynomial bases as well as Fourier series and have found that Chebyshev representation is the most suitable apparatus for compressing digital curves. We obtain compression rates of 30× to 50× and have the added benefit that the Legendre-Sobolev form, used for recognition, may be obtained by a single linear transformation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it