MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149814880 · doi:10.1109/vetecs.2003.1207793

High throughput downlink cellular packet data access with multiple antennas and multiuser diversity

2004· article· en· W2149814880 on OpenAlexaff
D.J. Mazzaresse, Witold A. Krzymień

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePrecodingComputer networkTelecommunications linkMIMOChannel state informationThroughputBase stationNetwork packetTransmitterDiversity gainFadingTransmit diversityScheduling (production processes)Channel (broadcasting)Electronic engineeringTelecommunicationsWirelessEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a discussion of MIMO (multiple-input multiple-output) system designed to exploit multiuser diversity, with the principal goal of increasing throughput of delay tolerant data services to nomadic and mobile users in cellular systems. We consider the downlink of a cellular packet data access scheme with a base station transmit antenna array and users equipped with a single receive antenna. We show that it can be preferable to transmit to several users simultaneously using the transmit antenna array even with sub-optimal signaling. This is in contrast to single antenna systems exploiting multiuser diversity and using link adaptation, in which the average throughput per sector is maximized, when in any packet time slot transmission occurs only to one user experiencing the best channel conditions at the time. We propose several scheduling algorithms and compare their performance to the throughput achievable with precoding and perfect channel state information at the transmitter. We show that the capacity scaling typical to MIMO systems can be achieved even with single-antenna mobile receivers, but only a fraction of that capacity can be achieved with limited channel knowledge at the transmitter, when multiuser diversity is exploited.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Network OptimizationFrench-language works237,207