MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149893488 · doi:10.26493/1855-3974.46.b2f

Deciding the deterministic property for soliton graphs

2009· article· en· W2149893488 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueArs Mathematica Contemporanea · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
Topicsemigroups and automata theory
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersDeutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
KeywordsMathematicsAutomatonDiscrete mathematicsCombinatoricsMatching (statistics)Deterministic automatonAlgorithmFinite-state machineTheoretical computer scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soliton automata are a graph theoretic model for electronic switching at the molecular level. In the design of soliton circuits, the deterministic property of the corresponding automata is of primary importance. The underlying graphs of such automata, called deterministic soliton graphs, are characterized in terms of graphs not having even-length cycles and graphs having a unique perfect matching. On the basis of this characterization, a modification of the currently most efficient unique perfect matching algorithm is worked out to decide in O ( m log 4 n ) time if a graph with n vertices and m edges defines a deterministic soliton automaton. A yet more efficient O ( m ) algorithm is given for the special case of chestnut and elementary soliton graphs. All of these algorithms are capable of constructing a state for the corresponding soliton automaton, and the general algorithm can also be used to simplify the automaton to an isomorphic elementary one.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score0.400

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it