Did the Mandatory Adoption of <scp>IFRS</scp> Affect the Earnings Quality of Canadian Firms?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This study examines whether the mandatory adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards ( IFRS ) affected the earnings quality of Canadian public firms. We compare the pre‐ IFRS versus the post‐ IFRS earnings quality, as measured by discretionary accruals, performance‐matched discretionary accruals, small positive earnings, earnings persistence, and the earnings response coefficient. Using a sample of 274 firms, we find no significant difference in discretionary accruals, performance‐matched discretionary accruals, the likelihood of small positive earnings, and the earnings response coefficient between the pre‐ and post‐ IFRS periods, despite the finding that firms have more persistent earnings in the post‐ IFRS period than in the pre‐ IFRS period. Overall, results from this study are mixed and suggest that there has been no significant change in earnings quality for public Canadian firms after the adoption of IFRS .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it