Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An arrangement graph G is the abstract graph obtained from an arrangement of lines L, in general position by associating vertices of G with the intersection points of L, and the edges of G with the line segments joining the intersection points of L. A simple polygon (respectively path) of n sides in general position, induces a set of n lines by extension of the line segments into lines. The main results of this paper are: • Given a graph G, it is NP-Hard to determine if G is the arrangement graph of some set of lines. • There are non-Hamiltonian arrangement graphs for arrangements of six lines and for odd values of n>6 lines. • All arrangements of n lines contain a subarrangement of size [Formula: see text] with an inducing polygon. • All arrangements on n lines contain an inducing path consisting of n line segments. A Java applet implementing the algorithm for determining such a path is also provided. • All arrangements on n hyperplanes in R d contain a simple inducing polygonal cycle of size n.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it