Adaptive packetization for error-prone transmission over 802.11 WLANs with hidden terminals
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Collision and fading are the two main sources of packet loss in wireless local area networks (WLANs) and as such, both are affected by the packetization at the medium access control (MAC) layer.While a larger packet is preferred to balance protocol header overhead, a shorter packet is less vulnerable to packet loss due to channel fading errors or staggered collisions in the presence of hidden terminals. Direct collisions due to backoff are not affected by packet size. Recently, Krishnan et. al. have developed a new technique for estimating probabilities of various components of packet loss, namely, direct and staggered collisions and fading. Motivated by this work, in this paper, we exploit ways in which packetization can be used to improve throughput performance of WLANs. We first show analytically that the effective throughput is a unimodal function of the packet size when considering both channel fading and staggered collisions. We then develop a measurement-based algorithm based on golden section search to arrive at an optimal packet size for MAC-layer transmissions. Our simulations demonstrate that packetization based on our search algorithm can greatly improve the effective throughput of sensing-limited nodes, and reduce video frame transfer delay in WLANs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it