Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Any sufficiently powerful explosion in air creates an expanding blast wave that propagates outwards from the source. The paper explores the physically based simulation of a blast wave impact on surrounding objects. The emphasis is on simplifying the underlying physical and chemical governing equations in order to achieve a visually believable result that performs in real time. A connected voxel model is used to represent objects, so that realistic solid debris is generated instead of flat polygons. The model permits arbitrary voxel shapes, which allow the creation of more complex objects with a lower number of voxels when compared to models using uniform voxel shapes. This model also overcomes certain limitations of the spring–mass particle model when it comes to representing rigid bodies. The paper also explores auxiliary visual effects caused by the blast wave, such as flame, smoke and dust. Each of these cues increases the visual plausibility of the explosion being simulated without being rigorously physically based or computationally intensive. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it