MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151188123 · doi:10.1109/twc.2008.070208

A Sensor Network Cross-Layer Power Control Algorithm that Incorporates Multiple-Access Interference

2008· article· en· W2151188123 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceProtocol stackPhysical layerCross-layer optimizationWireless sensor networkPower controlAlgorithmInterference (communication)Node (physics)Access controlEnergy consumptionTransmitter power outputWirelessEnergy (signal processing)Computer networkMedia access controlPower (physics)Link layerWireless networkTelecommunicationsChannel (broadcasting)EngineeringTransmitterElectrical engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a wireless sensor network (WSN) transmit power control algorithm designed to minimize WSN node energy consumption. The algorithm determines transmit power levels using an optimization that accounts for energy consumed by the physical and link layers of the protocol stack. This cross-layer optimization incorporates a physical layer model that uses knowledge of the WSN medium access control (MAC) layer algorithm to accurately model multiple access interference (MAI). Analytical and simulation results show that accounting for MAI in this fashion results in a significant energy savings relative to comparable WSN power control algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.905
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0060.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it