Diversity of silver resistance genes in IncH incompatibility group plasmids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Silver compounds are used as antimicrobial agents in medicine and bacteria that develop resistance to silver cations (Ag(+)) pose problems similar to those of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. The first set of Ag(+) resistance genes (sil) was from plasmid pMG101, now assigned to the IncHI incompatibility group. Questions of whether sil genes are unique to pMG101 or are more widely found, and whether they are associated with a specific incompatibility group or occur in many plasmid groups and on bacterial chromosomes were addressed. sil genes were identified in five IncH plasmids, but not in plasmids of the IncP incompatibility group. Three sil genes (silP, silR and silE) from these plasmids were PCR-amplified, cloned, sequenced and compared to those of pMG101. Differences of 0-50 nt per kb of sequence were found. Predicted gene products were 0-6% different in amino acid sequence, but the differences did not alter residues thought to be involved in protein function (see supplementary data at http://mic.sgmjournals.org or http://www.uic.edu/depts/mcmi/individual/gupta/index.htm). For representative IncH plasmid R476b and pMG101 the effects of Ag(+) exposure on resistance levels were measured by growth. The inducibility of silC, silR and silE gene expression after Ag(+) exposure was studied by reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR. Silver resistance increased after Ag(+) exposure for strains carrying plasmid R476b. silC and silE expression from R476b was inducible after Ag(+) exposure and was constitutive and high from pMG101. The mRNA levels for the regulatory gene silR was constitutive for both pMG101 and R476b. Close homologues for silABC(ORF96)RS from pMG101 are clustered on the chromosomes of Escherichia coli strains K-12 and O157:H7, without contiguous silP and silE homologues. Insertion deletions of the E. coli K-12 chromosomal homologues for silA and silP gave Ag(+) hypersensitivity for growth. The silA homologue knockout was complemented back to wild-type resistance by the same gene cloned on a plasmid. Homologues of sil genes have also been identified on other enterobacterial genomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".