A SPACE-EFFICIENT BACKTRACK-FREE REPRESENTATION FOR CONSTRAINT SATISFACTION PROBLEMS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper we present a radical approach to obtaining a backtrack-free representation for a constraint satisfaction problem: remove values that lead to dead-ends. This technique does not require additional space but has the drawback of removing solutions. We investigate a number of variations on the basic algorithm including the use of seed solutions, consistency techniques, and a variety of pruning heuristics. Our experimental results indicate that a significant proportion of the solutions to the original problem can be retained especially when an optimization algorithm that specifically searches for such “good” backtrack-free representations is employed. Further extensions increase solution retention by searching for high-coverage backtrack-free representations, by removing tuples rather than values, and by combining multiple backtrack-free representations. Our approach elucidates, for the first time, a three-way trade-off between space complexity, potential backtracks, and solution loss and enables algorithms that can actively reason about the trade-off between space, backtracks, and solution loss.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it