MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151289591 · doi:10.1109/ccece.1997.614815

A survey of the application of AI in capacitor allocation and control

2002· article· en· W2151289591 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimal Power Flow Distribution
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of CanadaUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkCapacitorComputer scienceControl (management)Fuzzy logicSoftwareFuzzy control systemFuzzy setSet (abstract data type)Genetic algorithmOptimal allocationArtificial intelligenceMathematical optimizationMachine learningEngineeringElectrical engineeringMathematicsVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The installation of power capacitors in distribution systems yields numerous economical benefits and improvements in system performance. There are many algorithms to determine the optimal capacitor sizes and their placement in distribution systems. A majority of the research in this area has used analytical or numerical methods to determine solutions for the optimal capacitor allocation problem. With the growing popularity of artificial intelligence (AI), and availability of AI software packages, several researchers have applied AI techniques to determine optimal capacitor allocation and control. The paper is a critical survey of such techniques including neural networks, genetic algorithms, expert systems, and fuzzy set theory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.409
Threshold uncertainty score0.094

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptimal Power Flow DistributionFrench-language works237,207