MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151384915 · doi:10.1142/s0218001409007338

K-MEANS CLUSTERING FOR PROBLEMS WITH PERIODIC ATTRIBUTES

2009· article· en· W2151384915 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersAkademie Věd České Republiky
KeywordsTrigonometryComputer scienceCluster analysisMetric (unit)Simple (philosophy)AlgorithmMinificationEncoding (memory)MathematicsMathematical optimizationArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The K-means algorithm is very popular in the machine learning community due to its inherent simplicity. However, in its basic form, it is not suitable for use in problems which contain periodic attributes, such as oscillator phase, hour of day or directional heading. A commonly used technique of trigonometrically encoding periodic input attributes to artificially generate the required topology introduces a systematic error. In this paper, a metric which induces a conceptually correct topology for periodic attributes is embedded into the K-means algorithm. This requires solving a non-convex minimization problem in the maximization step. Results of numerical experiments comparing the proposed algorithm to K-means with trigonometric encoding on synthetically generated data are reported. The advantage of using the proposed K-means algorithm is also shown on a real example using gas load data to build simple predictive models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.292

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it