FUSE: Front-End User Framework for O/S Abstraction of Hardware Accelerators
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SoCs can be implemented on a single FPGA, offering designers a unique opportunity for Embedded Systems. Instead of defining a fixed architecture early in the design process, the reconfigurable platform allows architectural redesign to meet the system's specific needs. However, the ability to instantiate new modules in the reconfigurable hardware provides a unique set of challenges for integration, particularly to the software (SW) designer. Specifically, the Operating System (OS) cannot automatically abstract these platform changes without redesign. In this paper, we present FUSE, a framework for HW accelerator abstraction that provides: 1) transparency to the SW designer at the application level, and 2) OS support for easy HW accelerator integration. We illustrate FUSE as an API for an embedded Linux OS with POSIX threads on Xilinx's Micro Blaze on a Virtex5. For three different applications and HW accelerators, we achieve performance speedups ranging from 6.4-37×.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it