MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151501142 · doi:10.1109/pacrim.1997.620426

Designing meta-interfaces for object-oriented operating systems

2002· article· en· W2151501142 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSecurity and Verification in Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersUniversity of Washington
KeywordsFlexibility (engineering)Computer scienceIngenuityOverhead (engineering)Kernel (algebra)Object-oriented programmingDistributed computingCode (set theory)Object (grammar)Embedded systemSoftware engineeringOperating systemProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modern multimedia applications place ever-growing performance and flexibility demands on operating systems. Unfortunately, many existing operating systems are inflexible; because of their monolithic nature, they cannot be easily changed to accommodate these demands. Some flexibility can be gained by decomposing such monolithic systems into microkernels and user-level components. Creating and modifying these components, however remains complicated, and the performance overhead is often high. Alternatively, flexibility can be gained by linking extensions directly into the kernel. This usually preserves performance but much ingenuity is required to prevent new code from corrupting existing components, and to remove old code when it is no longer needed. The incorporation of meta-objects, meta-spaces and meta-interfaces into flexible operating systems offers promising solutions to these problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score0.406

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSecurity and Verification in ComputingFrench-language works237,207