MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151537799 · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2006.881111

Derivation of an Accurate Polynomial Representation of the Transient Stability Boundary

2006· article· en· W2151537799 on OpenAlexafffund
A. G. Buddhika P. Jayasekara, U.D. Annakkage

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Systems · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsNonlinear systemMathematicsElectric power systemControl theory (sociology)PolynomialTransient (computer programming)Boundary (topology)Applied mathematicsFunction (biology)Mathematical optimizationLinear systemStability (learning theory)Transformation (genetics)Power (physics)Computer scienceMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an efficient method to estimate a transient stability boundary (TSB) as a nonlinear function of power system variables. The proposed method exploits the computational efficiency of linear estimation methods to determine an accurate nonlinear function. The novelty of the proposed method is that a nonlinear transformation is applied to the original variables, voltage magnitudes, and phase angles, so that the TSB is approximately linear in terms of the transformed variables. The linear function obtained using the transformed variables is indeed nonlinear in terms of original variables. The attractiveness of this method is that the estimated function is not a linearized approximation, although a linear estimation method is used. The potential of the proposed method is demonstrated using the New England 39-bus system and a larger power system with 470 buses

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations67
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power SystemsSame topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207