A spectral density approach for modelling continuous vertical forces on pedestrian structures due to walking
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Existing walking models used for vibration serviceability assessment of structures carrying pedestrians are typically based on measurements of single footfalls replicated at precise intervals. This assumed perfect periodicity allows walking forces to be modelled as a Fourier series based on the walking pace and its integer multiples. This paper examines real continuous walking forces obtained from an instrumented treadmill and the effect of their random imperfections through time simulations of structural response and shows that there are significant differences between responses due to the imperfect real walking forces and the equivalent perfectly periodic simulation. These differences are most significant for higher harmonics where the simulated vibration response is overestimated. As a realistic representation of imperfect walking is an auto-spectral density function, the random character naturally leads to a stochastic approach to treatment of pedestrian loading applied in the frequency domain. The approach can be used for single pedestrians as well as crowd loading where correlation between pedestrians as well as statistics of their pacing rates is used.Key words: vibration, coherence, loading, footbridges, gait, floors, pedestrians, spectral density.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it