MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151875243 · doi:10.1109/ivmspw.2013.6611925

QP initialization and adaptive MAD prediction for rate control in HEVC-based multi-view video coding

2013· article· en· W2151875243 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Coding and Compression Technologies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInitializationComputer scienceReference softwareCoding (social sciences)Rate distortionMultiview Video CodingQuantization (signal processing)Coding tree unitBit rateAlgorithmReal-time computingArtificial intelligenceVideo processingDecoding methodsSoftwareVideo trackingMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rate control is an important component of an end-to-end video communication system. Although rate control is not a part of a video coding standard, it is necessary for practical deployment. Currently, there are several proposals for rate control in the upcoming High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) standard, but there is no rate control scheme for HEVC-based multi-view extension. In this paper, we apply the newly recommended R-λ model-based HEVC rate control to the multi-view scenario, and propose two improvements. One improvement deals with Quantization Parameter (QP) initialization, and the other deals with adaptive Mean Absolute Difference (MAD) prediction. Results demonstrate the accuracy of the proposed methods, the resulting reduced fluctuation of instantaneous bitrate, as well as an improvement in rate-distortion performance compared to the R-λ rate control alone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score0.345

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it