MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2151968085 · doi:10.1093/chromsci/bmr052

Developments in Ultra-Fast Temperature Programming with Silicon Micromachined Gas Chromatography: Performance and Limitations

2012· article· en· W2151968085 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chromatographic Science · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Chromatography
Canadian institutionsDow Chemical (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReproducibilityChemistrySiliconGas chromatographyRelative standard deviationRetention timeDetectorChromatographyThermal stabilityAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Atmospheric temperature rangeThermal conductivityRange (aeronautics)Process engineeringDetection limitComputer scienceMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryThermodynamicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Various commercially available ultra-fast temperature programming approaches were integrated to silicon micromachined GC (micro-GC) for performance improvement assessment. The combined technique of micro-GC and ultra-fast temperature programming up to a rate of 6°C/second yielded an extended analysis range to undecane (nC(11)), improved signal detectability by at least a factor of three for the solutes studied with respectable one day reproducibility of less than 1% relative standard deviation in retention time (n = 20). Through careful control of various variables affecting retention time, performance improvements can be extended further. The various effects temperature programming has on the stability of thermal conductivity detector as well as criteria that need to be met for the successful implementation of ultra-fast temperature programming in micro-GC are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it