MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152098614 · doi:10.1109/icip.1994.413249

Multiresolution skeletonization an electrostatic field-based approach

2002· article· en· W2152098614 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSkeletonizationRepresentation (politics)Computer scienceBoundary (topology)Field (mathematics)Artificial intelligenceObject (grammar)Skeleton (computer programming)Theoretical computer scienceMedial axisAlgorithmComputer visionPattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Skeleton representation of an object is believed to be a powerful representation that captures both boundary and region information of the object. The skeleton of a shape is a representation composed of idealized thin lines that preserve the connectivity or topology of the original shape. Although the literature contains a large number of skeletonization algorithms, many open problems remain. A new skeletonization approach that relies on the electrostatic field theory (EFT) is proposed. Many problems associated with existing skeletonization algorithms are solved using the proposed approach. In particular, connectivity, thinness, and other desirable features of a skeleton are guaranteed. Furthermore, the electrostatic field-based approach captures notions of corner detection, multiple scale, thinning, and skeletonization all within one unified framework. Experimental results are very encouraging and are used to illustrate the potential of the proposed approach.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score0.262

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it