MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152103449 · doi:10.1109/robot.2007.363632

A formal framework for robot learning and control under model uncertainty

2007· article· en· W2152103449 on OpenAlexaff
Robin Jaulmes, Joëlle Pineau, Doina Precup

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPartially observable Markov decision processA priori and a posterioriComputer scienceRobotMarkov decision processObservableDomain (mathematical analysis)Markov processProcess (computing)Artificial intelligenceControl (management)Simple (philosophy)Machine learningMarkov chainMarkov modelMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While the partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) provides a formal framework for the problem of robot control under uncertainty, it typically assumes a known and stationary model of the environment. In this paper, we study the problem of finding an optimal policy for controlling a robot in a partially observable domain, where the model is not perfectly known, and may change over time. We present an algorithm called MEDUSA which incrementally learns a POMDP model using queries, while still optimizing a reward function. We demonstrate effectiveness of the approach for a simple scenario, where a robot seeking a person has minimal a priori knowledge of its own sensor model, as well as where the person is located.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/ProceedingsSame topicMachine Learning and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207