Quantity and Distribution of Oily Contaminants Present in Flame-resistant Thermal-protective Textiles
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper reports an experimental study wherein the quantity and distribution of oily contaminants present in flame-resistant fabrics (FR) after contamination and decontamination was determined using radiotracer analysis and scanning electron microscopy. The experimental variables were fabric type, laundry treatment, and number of contamination/decontamination cycles. Laundry treatments involving a pre-wash product were the most effective in removing oil from all FR fabrics regardless of the number of contamination/ decontamination cycles. Accumulation of oily contaminants was noted after five contamination/ decontamination cycles regardless of the fabric type or laundry treatment. FR cotton/nylon retained the most residual oil for all laundry treatments. No oil remained in the interior of the aramid, viscose, and nylon fibers, but rather remained on the surface so that it was removed easily during decontamination. A significant quantity of oil was located in the interior of the cotton fibers, making it difficult to remove during decontamination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it