MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152242816 · doi:10.1109/infcom.2007.217

On Q(H log H) Scaling of Network Delays

2007· article· en· W2152242816 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAdvanced Queuing Theory Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNetwork calculusBounded functionUpper and lower boundsScalingNode (physics)Computer scienceNetwork packetBinary logarithmPath (computing)Computer networkDiscrete mathematicsMathematicsCombinatoricsTopology (electrical circuits)Quality of servicePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A recent result in network calculus theory provided statistical delay bounds for exponentially bounded traffic that grow as O(H log H) with the number of nodes on the network path. In this paper we establish the corresponding lower bound which shows that for such such types of traffic, typical end-to-end delays can indeed grow as Theta (H log H). The lower bound is obtained by analyzing the end-to-end delay in a tandem network where each packet maintains the same service time at each traversed node. The results of this paper provide conclusive evidence that, in general, delays have a qualitatively different scaling behavior than is suggested by a worst-case analysis or by an analysis that assumes independent service times at network nodes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.568
Threshold uncertainty score0.542

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Queuing Theory AnalysisFrench-language works237,207