In Situ Motion Capture of Speed Skating: Escaping the Treadmill
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The advent of the Kinect depth imager has opened the door to motion capture applications that would have been much more costly with previous technologies. In part, the Kinect achieves this by focusing on a very specific application domain, thus narrowing the requirement for the motion capture system. Specifically, Kinect motion capture works best within a small physical space while the camera is stationary. We seek to extend Kinect motion capture for use in athletic training - speed skating in particular - by placing the Kinect on a mobile, robotic platform to capture motion in situ. Athletes move over large distances, so the mobile platform addresses the limited viewing area of the Kinect. As the platform moves, we must also account for the now dynamic background against which the athlete performs. The result is a novel, visually-guided robotic platform that follows athletes, allowing us to capture motion and images that would not be possible with a treadmill. We describe the system in detail and give examples of the system capturing the motion of a speed skater at typical training speeds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it