MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152324445 · doi:10.1109/tsmcb.2005.850180

Dynamic Algorithms for the Shortest Path Routing Problem: Learning Automata-Based Solutions

2005· article· en· W2152324445 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part B (Cybernetics) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptimization and Search Problems
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShortest path problemShortest Path Faster AlgorithmK shortest path routingAlgorithmWidest path problemComputer scienceYen's algorithmEuclidean shortest pathDistanceGraphMathematicsDijkstra's algorithmTheoretical computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the first Learning Automaton-based solution to the dynamic single source shortest path problem. It involves finding the shortest path in a single-source stochastic graph topology where there are continuous probabilistic updates in the edge-weights. The algorithm is significantly more efficient than the existing solutions, and can be used to find the "statistical" shortest path tree in the "average" graph topology. It converges to this solution irrespective of whether there are new changes in edge-weights taking place or not. In such random settings, the proposed learning automata solution converges to the set of shortest paths. On the other hand, the existing algorithms will fail to exhibit such a behavior, and would recalculate the affected shortest paths after each weight-change. The important contribution of the proposed algorithm is that all the edges in a stochastic graph are not probed, and even if they are, they are not all probed equally often. Indeed, the algorithm attempts to almost always probe only those edges that will be included in the shortest path graph, while probing the other edges minimally. This increases the performance of the proposed algorithm. All the algorithms were tested in environments where edge-weights change stochastically, and where the graph topologies undergo multiple simultaneous edge-weight updates. Its superiority in terms of the average number of processed nodes, scanned edges and the time per update operation, when compared with the existing algorithms, was experimentally established. The algorithm can be applicable in domains ranging from ground transportation to aerospace, from civilian applications to military, from spatial database applications to telecommunications networking.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it