MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152678054 · doi:10.1109/pac.1999.795390

Design and testing of the ISAC RFQ control system

2003· article· en· W2152678054 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 1999 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.99CH36366) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital signal processingComputer scienceControl systemComputer hardwareDigital signal processorRadio frequencyEmbedded systemEngineeringElectrical engineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Digital Signal Processor-based control system has been designed and tested for use with the ISAC RFQ accelerator. This system uses a direct digital synthesizer and phase-locked loop to generate the 35 MHz nominal cavity frequency. One DSP provides both in-phase and quadrature control for the system. A second DSP operates the cavity tuning mechanism. A reference signal with digital controlled phase shift is output for use in the upstream cavity in the beam path, an 11.66 MHz prebuncher. The system incorporates spark and high Voltage Standing Wave Ratio detection and protection. It also includes operator-controlled hardware limiting, and visual feedback of operating conditions. The complete system including low-level RF components is housed in a VXI rack. Turn-key operation is achieved via a supervisory control, which consists of a Windows-based server. This server broadcasts system status using User Datagrams, and listens on control commands via TCP. Network-aware database objects interpret these messages to provide control and display of the system operating parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.465
Threshold uncertainty score0.923

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it