MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153045803 · doi:10.1002/sim.3358

Estimation method of the semiparametric mixture cure gamma frailty model

2008· article· en· W2153045803 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueStatistics in Medicine · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsUnobservableMixture modelCovariateExpectation–maximization algorithmComputer scienceImputation (statistics)StatisticsAccelerated failure time modelEconometricsMaximum likelihoodMathematicsArtificial intelligenceMissing dataMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mixture cure frailty model has been proposed to analyze censored survival data with a cured fraction and unobservable information among the uncured patients. Different from a usual mixture cure model, the frailty model is employed to model the latency component in the mixture cure frailty model. In this paper, we extend the mixture cure frailty model by incorporating covariates into both the cure rate and the latency distribution parts of the model and propose a semiparametric estimation method for the model. The Expectation Maximization (EM) algorithm and the multiple imputation method are employed to estimate parameters of interest. In the simulation study, we show that both estimation methods work well. To illustrate, we apply the model and the proposed methods to a data set of failure times from bone marrow transplant patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.410
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.137
GPT teacher head0.444
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it