MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153116370 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2008.4518072

Distributed throughput maximization in hybrid-forwarding P2P VoD applications

2008· article· en· W2153116370 on OpenAlexaff
Yifeng He, Ivan Lee, Ling Guan

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPeer-to-Peer Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkScalabilityNetwork packetRedundancy (engineering)ThroughputPacket forwardingCoding (social sciences)Distributed computingOperating systemWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In peer-to-peer (P2P) video-on-demand (VoD) systems, a scalable source coding is a promising solution to provide heterogeneous peers with different video quality. In a scalable P2P VoD system, the received video quality at each peer is dependent on the throughput if the packet redundancy has been addressed with coding techniques. In this paper, we propose a hybrid-forwarding P2P VoD architecture, which integrates both the buffer-forwarding approach and storage-forwarding approach. Furthermore, we develop a distributed algorithm to maximize the throughput. Through simulations, we demonstrate that the hybrid-forwarding architecture can obtain a much higher throughput compared to the architecture with only buffer-forwarding links or with only storage-forwarding links.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the ... IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal ProcessingSame topicPeer-to-Peer Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207