Multi-hop CDMA cellular networks with power control
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The concept of multi-hop CDMA cellular networks has been around for sometime now. It is a widely accepted assumption that using multi-hopping in cellular networks will increase the cellular capacity. This capacity increase has yet to be quantified. In this paper, this quantification is done, for the first time, for multi-hop CDMA cellular networks with power control. CDMA networks are interference limited. For this reason, interference is calculated at BSs and relaying MTs during an uplink slot, assuming power control is in use in all hops. The results for interference calculations show the possible increase in capacity, by increasing either the number of simultaneous calls or data rates. An increase of 23% in the number of supported simultaneous calls is shown to be possible even with relaying MTs being different than active MTs sending their own data. This paper derives formulas to calculate interference at BSs and MTs using power control in all hops. It also quantifies the potential capacity increase using multi-hopping with power control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it