MétaCan
Menu
← all works

A high‐order accurate particle‐in‐cell method

2012· article· en· 67 citations· W2153166947 on OpenAlex· 10.1002/nme.3356

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

Canadian affiliationAn author listed a Canadian institution. This is the only route the usual frame has.

Full frame distilled prediction

Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

Candidate categories
none
Consensus categories
none
Domain
Candidate signal: noneConsensus signal: none
Study design
Candidate signal: Simulation or modelingConsensus signal: Simulation or modeling
Genre
Candidate signal: MethodsConsensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score
0.386
Threshold uncertainty score
0.812
Validation status
machine_predicted_unvalidated · codex-gemma-dda1882f352a

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread
0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Abstract

SUMMARY We propose the use of high‐order weighted essentially non‐oscillatory interpolation and moving‐least‐squares approximation schemes alongside high‐order time integration to enable high‐order accurate particle‐in‐cell methods. The key insight is to view the unstructured set of particles as the underlying representation of the continuous fields; the grid used to evaluate integro–differential coupling terms is purely auxiliary. We also include a novel regularization term to avoid the accumulation of noise in the particle samples without harming the convergence rate. We include numerical examples for several model problems: advection–diffusion, shallow water, and incompressible Navier–Stokes in vorticity formulation. The implementation demonstrates fourth‐order convergence, shows very low numerical dissipation, and is competitive with high‐order Eulerian schemes. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

The record

Venue
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering
Topic
Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
Field
Engineering
Canadian institutions
University of British Columbia
Funders
not available
Keywords
AdvectionRegularization (linguistics)Numerical diffusionEulerian pathApplied mathematicsGridCompressibilityInterpolation (computer graphics)MathematicsRate of convergenceConvergence (economics)Mathematical optimizationComputer scienceClassical mechanicsPhysicsKey (lock)MechanicsGeometryLagrangianMotion (physics)
Has abstract in OpenAlex
yes