MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153168201 · doi:10.1109/icsmc.2007.4413614

Job shop deadlock-free scheduling using Mixed Integer Programming and rank matrices

2007· article· en· W2153168201 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicScheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInteger programmingComputer scienceDeadlockScheduling (production processes)Job shop schedulingHeuristicMathematical optimizationRank (graph theory)Blocking (statistics)Distributed computingMathematicsAlgorithmScheduleArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The goal of this paper is to propose a novel mixed integer programming (MIP) formulation for the deadlock-free job shop scheduling problem with limited capacity buffers. Two scenarios are considered; the presence of a central buffer, and unit capacity input buffers for the machines. Due to the complexity of the problem, an operations insertion heuristic based on rank matrices is also proposed to solve the problem. In this heuristic, rank matrices are used to generate the schedules and to check for deadlock situations and machine blocking considering the presence of a central buffer. To evaluate the performances of the mathematical models and the heuristic, comparisons to other approaches reported in literature are conducted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.675

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicScheduling and Optimization AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207