MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153353727 · doi:10.1109/robot.2003.1241759

Genetic algorithm based path planning for a mobile robot

2004· article· en· W2153353727 on OpenAlexaff
Jianping Tu, Simon X. Yang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMobile robotMotion planningComputer scienceRobotGenetic algorithmPath (computing)ChromosomeAlgorithmAny-angle path planningMobile robot navigationObstacleArtificial intelligenceReal-time computingRobot controlComputer networkMachine learningGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a novel genetic algorithm based approach to path planning of a mobile robot is proposed. The major characteristic of the proposed algorithm is that the chromosome has a variable length. The location target and obstacles are included to find a path for a mobile robot in an environment that is a 2D workplace discretized into a grid net. Each cell in the net is a gene. The number of genes in one chromosome depends on the environment. The locations of the robot, the target and the obstacle are marked in the workplace. The proposed algorithm is capable of generating collision-free paths for a mobile robot in both static and dynamic environments. In a static environment, the generated robot path is optimal in the sense of the shortest distance. The effectiveness of the proposed model is demonstrated by simulation studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations187
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207