MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153374297 · doi:10.1093/biomet/ass017

Nonparametric incidence estimation from prevalent cohort survival data

2012· article· en· W2153374297 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiometrika · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersU.S. Public Health ServiceNational Institutes of HealthFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesJohns Hopkins University
KeywordsNonparametric statisticsIncidence (geometry)EstimatorStatisticsCohortCumulative incidenceEpidemiologyDemographyEstimationCohort studyPopulationMathematicsMedicineEconometricsEnvironmental healthInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Incidence is an important epidemiological concept most suitably studied using an incident cohort study. However, data are often collected from the more feasible prevalent cohort study, whereby diseased individuals are recruited through a cross-sectional survey and followed in time. In the absence of temporal trends in survival, we derive an efficient nonparametric estimator of the cumulative incidence based on such data and study its asymptotic properties. Arbitrary calendar time variations in disease incidence are allowed. Age-specific incidence and adjustments for both stratified sampling and temporal variations in survival are also discussed. Simulation results are presented and data from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging are analysed to infer the incidence of dementia in the Canadian elderly population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.418
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.237
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it