MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153422351 · doi:10.1109/tia.2011.2161858

Influence of Reactors on Input Harmonics of Variable Frequency Drives

2011· article· en· W2153422351 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaodong Liang, Obinna Ilochonwu, Jeffrey Chun Tatt Lim

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Turbine Control Systems
Canadian institutionsSchlumberger (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarmonicsPower factorPower (physics)Electrical impedanceLine (geometry)EngineeringComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)VoltageElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringAutomotive engineeringControl (management)MathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AC line reactors and dc link reactors are widely used in variable frequency drives (VFDs) to improve the drive performance such as reducing input harmonics, improving the input power factor, and protecting the drives from surges, etc. The effectiveness of both types of reactors in reducing input harmonics is affected by many factors, including the loading of the drives and the system source impedance. In this paper, a simulation is conducted to investigate the influence of such factors. Two power distribution systems with VFDs as the dominant loads in the oil field are used as the case studies. The rules to evaluate the needs and effectiveness using ac line or dc link reactors are proposed for practical applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industry ApplicationsSame topicWind Turbine Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207