MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153422351 · doi:10.1109/tia.2011.2161858

Influence of Reactors on Input Harmonics of Variable Frequency Drives

2011· article· en· W2153422351 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Turbine Control Systems
Canadian institutionsSchlumberger (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarmonicsPower factorPower (physics)Electrical impedanceLine (geometry)EngineeringComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)VoltageElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringAutomotive engineeringControl (management)MathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AC line reactors and dc link reactors are widely used in variable frequency drives (VFDs) to improve the drive performance such as reducing input harmonics, improving the input power factor, and protecting the drives from surges, etc. The effectiveness of both types of reactors in reducing input harmonics is affected by many factors, including the loading of the drives and the system source impedance. In this paper, a simulation is conducted to investigate the influence of such factors. Two power distribution systems with VFDs as the dominant loads in the oil field are used as the case studies. The rules to evaluate the needs and effectiveness using ac line or dc link reactors are proposed for practical applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.779
Threshold uncertainty score0.732

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it