MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153505540 · doi:10.4000/com.2993

 Quand l’agriculture redessine le territoire : à qui profite l’expansion des plantations de palmiers à huile au Sabah ?

2008· article· fr· W2153505540 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers d Outre-Mer · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicOil Palm Production and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCenter for Northern Studies
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceForestryGeographyHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’État du Sabah en Malaysia connaît actuellement des transformations territoriales majeures causées par la poursuite de l’expansion rapide des plantations de palmier à huile. Dans ce contexte, nous proposons une analyse des implications socio-économiques du modèle de la plantation de palmier à huile qui domine l’économie agricole de cet État. La persistance de la logique coloniale dont l’objectif visait à repousser la frontière de l’exploitation des ressources naturelles guide l’analyse. L’argumentation soutient que l’expansion contemporaine de la culture du palmier à huile au Sabah répond en premier lieu à la logique des croissances capitalistes nationale et mondiale. Les objectifs sociaux ayant motivé d’autres projets de colonisation agricole depuis l’Indépendance de la Malaysia ont pour la plupart été délaissés. Les autorités locales voient prendre forme une économie dont l’importance des retombées pour les populations locales est discutable alors que les impacts environnementaux sont significatifs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it