MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153609413 · doi:10.1002/masy.200450105

Infrared spectroscopy studies of structure and orientation in clay‐reinforced polyamide‐6 nanocomposites

2004· article· en· W2153609413 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Symposia · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Nanocomposites and Properties
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolyamideMaterials scienceCrystallinityNanocompositeComposite materialPhase (matter)Infrared spectroscopyPolymerNylon 6MontmorilloniteChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Infrared (IR) spectroscopy was used to study the surface (by means of external reflection) and the bulk (by means of transmission measurements on microtomed slices) of specimens obtained by injection moulding of a commercial polyamide‐6 clay‐based nanocomposite material (NCH = nylon clay hybrid) at different mould temperatures and with different part geometries. Comparisons were made with equivalent non‐reinforced polymer (PA‐6). For the PA‐6, the mould temperature influences the crystalline structure, with the γ phase predominating at 50°C and the α phase at 80°C. However, in the NCH material the ( phase is favoured, even at 80°C. In all cases the crystallinity increases on going from the surface to the core. The polymer chains are oriented in the flow direction, and the orientation is higher for parts with more elongated shapes. It does not vary greatly across the part thickness, except for a thin surface layer, where it is significantly higher. Both at the surface and in the bulk, the crystalline phase orientation is higher for the NCH than for the PA‐6.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.741

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it