Infrared spectroscopy studies of structure and orientation in clay‐reinforced polyamide‐6 nanocomposites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Infrared (IR) spectroscopy was used to study the surface (by means of external reflection) and the bulk (by means of transmission measurements on microtomed slices) of specimens obtained by injection moulding of a commercial polyamide‐6 clay‐based nanocomposite material (NCH = nylon clay hybrid) at different mould temperatures and with different part geometries. Comparisons were made with equivalent non‐reinforced polymer (PA‐6). For the PA‐6, the mould temperature influences the crystalline structure, with the γ phase predominating at 50°C and the α phase at 80°C. However, in the NCH material the ( phase is favoured, even at 80°C. In all cases the crystallinity increases on going from the surface to the core. The polymer chains are oriented in the flow direction, and the orientation is higher for parts with more elongated shapes. It does not vary greatly across the part thickness, except for a thin surface layer, where it is significantly higher. Both at the surface and in the bulk, the crystalline phase orientation is higher for the NCH than for the PA‐6.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".