MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2153641542 · doi:10.1142/s0218127414500837

Seven Limit Cycles Around a Focus Point in a Simple Three-Dimensional Quadratic Vector Field

2014· article· en· W2153641542 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsCenter manifoldVector fieldFocus (optics)Quadratic equationLimit (mathematics)Manifold (fluid mechanics)ComputationField (mathematics)PolynomialApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisPure mathematicsGeometryHopf bifurcationAlgorithmPhysicsBifurcation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we show that a simple three-dimensional quadratic vector field can have at least seven small-amplitude limit cycles, bifurcating from a Hopf critical point. This result is surprisingly higher than the Bautin's result for quadratic planar vector fields which can only have three small-amplitude limit cycles bifurcating from an elementary focus or an elementary center. The methods used in this paper include computing focus values, and solving multivariate polynomial systems using modular regular chains. In order to obtain higher-order focus values for nonplanar dynamical systems, computationally efficient approaches combined with center manifold computation must be adopted. A recently developed explicit, recursive formula and Maple program for computing the normal form and center manifold of general n-dimensional systems is applied to compute the focus values of the three-dimensional vector field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.242
Threshold uncertainty score0.322

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it