MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154032899 · doi:10.1109/jssc.2007.904152

Low-Power Circuits for a 2.5-V, 10.7-to-86-Gb/s Serial Transmitter in 130-nm SiGe BiCMOS

2007· article· en· W2154032899 on OpenAlexafffund
Timothy O. Dickson, Sorin P. Voinigescu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCMC Microsystems
KeywordsBiCMOSTransmitterElectrical engineeringHeterojunction bipolar transistorPower consumptionVoltageElectronic circuitSerial communicationBlock (permutation group theory)Power (physics)Electronic engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceMaterials scienceTelecommunicationsTransistorPhysicsBipolar junction transistorMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Low-power building blocks for a serial transmitter operating up to 86 Gb/s are designed and implemented in a 130-nm SiGe BiCMOS technology with 150-GHz SiGe fTHBT. Design techniques are presented which aim to minimize high-speed building block power consumption. They include lowering the supply voltage by employing a true BiCMOS high-speed logic family, as well as reducing current consumption by trading off tail currents for inductive peaking. A serial transmitter testchip consuming under 1 W is fabricated and operation is verified up to 86 Gb/s at room temperature (92 Gb/s and 71 Gb/s at 0degC and 100degC, respectively). The circuit operates from a 2.5-V supply voltage, which is the lowest supply voltage for circuits at this data rate in silicon technologies reported to date.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Solid-State CircuitsSame topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207