MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154087305 · doi:10.1109/cca.2004.1387243

Development of an adaptive learning PD control for robotic system applications

2005· article· en· W2154087305 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIterative Learning Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Feed forwardIterative learning controlConvergence (economics)TrajectoryAdaptive controlControl systemControl engineeringComputer scienceStability (learning theory)Control (management)Tracking (education)Sliding mode controlNonlinear systemEngineeringArtificial intelligenceMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel control algorithm, called the adaptive learning PD (AL-PD) control method, is proposed. This control algorithm consists of a PD control as a basic feedback loop and a feedforward loop that is generated from the previous control state in an iterative mode. The stability analysis of AL-PD control is proved that shows that the AL-PD control can guarantee asymptotic convergence for trajectory tracking. Fixed gain PD control, nonlinear PD (NPD) control, and AL-PD control are applied to the control of two kinds of robotic systems. A comparative study of three PD-based controllers is conducted to understand how different control schemes affect the trajectory tracking performance. It is confirmed through simulation that the proposed AL-PD control is very promising for improving the tracking performance of robotic systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.470

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIterative Learning Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207