MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154430520 · doi:10.5267/j.ijiec.2012.05.006

Introducing mass balancing theorem for network flow maximization

2012· article· en· W2154430520 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptimization and Search Problems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLeverhulme Trust
KeywordsMaximizationFlow (mathematics)Flow networkComputer scienceMathematical optimizationMathematicsMathematical economicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Maximization of flow through the network is required in many practical applications such as water supply flow networks, Oil and Gas flow networks, and transportation networks etc. In this paper a new theorem is presented that has direct application on maximization of flow through the network. This theorem suggests that the maximization of network flow can be achieved by visiting only unbalanced nodes rather than the whole network. Therefore based on this theorem a method is developed that maximizes flow thorough the network by visiting only unbalanced nodes. Hence this method can achieve solution in a sub-linear time where network has fewer unbalanced nodes. However this method has worst case complexity of order O(m2-m), where m is the number of edges. Furthermore it is shown that this theorem has also potential to make optimization an easier task in a multi-commodity flow environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.334
Threshold uncertainty score0.427

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it